I enjoyed the light hearted theme of this app. I don't agree with the censoring of these completely tasteful masterpieces used, however. I believe these paintings need to be seen for their artistic quality and can only be appreciated when the artist's depictions are not censored. Here's to hoping the censor is lifted and this app can be what it was intended--A funny twist combined with the beauty of the painted.

So, even though I am well over 18 I can't be subjected to fine art nudes? Seriously, shame on the censors for allowing fart apps and rejecting fine art nudes.

Beautiful works of art painted by famous artists scaled down for easy viewing on the iPod touch or iPhone. I like how it gives you the date and artist's info on it. Now should these pictures be censored? I do not think so. It doesn't show any sexual positions, only nude women posing. When you go to museums you don't censored bars or in this case bikinis on the statues and paintings. I say you have every right to make this app uncesored. Although it would be kind of funny to choose different style/color bikinis as an option.

Why not show re brest and viginas it all art weather it a pinis boobs or vigna DONT CHANG ART!!!!!

Although the idea is clever and these paintings should be enjoyed as the artist intended, I don't think lifting the censor should really take effect. Allowing any sort of nudity really shouldn't be considered. If a patron of the arts would like to see the given paintings in their truest form, there are art galleries they can visit or if they must see these pictures on the iPhone, use safari.

Why do people have to go and pin beautiful art as pornography?! The body is a beautiful thing not something to cover up and be ashamed of

I can't believe that theese beautiful paintings could not be shown in their original state. What all must understand I can see theese in original state online or a museum. So all must be able to enjoy greatness the while piece. I hope to see theese in their natural state. As well ad others added in the future. Thanks.

It's really a shame that the original fine arts are considered as porn. I would say that you must have a dirty mind if you see those fine arts as porn pics. An old buddism saying: what you see is what you think.

Really enjoyed the app - very clever - nice job! Wish list (maybe for a future paid version): I would like to see more artworks, and to be fair, there ought to be some males included (Michelangelo's David for example) - more info on the artworks would be educational - and maybe a way to remove the suits when the phone is right-side up (unless I missed that)

Grow up apple! The Nazi's favored censorship too. When you label it porno, it then becomes only that. Before Apples morality police were here to save us, it was a beautiful peice of art celebrating the the human form, but, in their wisdom they have found it to be a tawdry pinup? I think not. Leave to some programming geeks to not know their @sses from their elbows, artistically speaking.

Remember the first Apple commercial? Open defiance of Big Brother. Looks like they're Big Brother now. Why? To sell more product to puritans? Wake up, Apple! The largest collection of porn in the history of mankind is already on every iPhone, and it's available through Apple's own Safari browser. How can there be any justification for such heavy-handed censorship? A big thank you to the developer for making such a light-hearted and powerful mockery of Apple's censors.

Just allow an option to take nudity on or off

I'm glad apple is censoring these apps. I don't need my 14 year old downloading free apps of naked women! Art or not!

ARE KIDDING APPLE !!!!!!!

Nudity should be alowed cuz it's sexy a

I mean come on honestly guys? We don't need 10 year olds looking at naked women they found on the app store. If you are really looking to appreciate art, go to a museum!

art is art and should be left untouched with fake add ons like bikinis. just have it uncensored, so what, there paintings they should be uncensored because the painters would want it that way

Horrible. The human body is sacred and should be viewed as such. I think even pornography possess aspects of art. It is only when you Shame our condition by deeming it taboo, that you create an opposition to the beauty of our condition. You right-winged conservatives are the filthy pornographors. Evil is Shame!

Crying about how they don't want their little precious baby viewing porn... There are PARENTAL CONTROLS in 3.0. How about you PAY ATTENTION to what your children are doing and getting into. Stop whining for everyone else to parent and raise your lousy brat (and then crying foul when they want to paddle them in school)

I do not see any problem with having these paintings uncensored. Nobody is engaging in sex, these are just portraits of the beautiful feminine figure. I fail to understand why people have a problem with seeing others naked anyway. It does not harm children to see what we seem innapropriate body parts. If there is an issue with this application, I believe that it is due to people hating the human form. Humans are the only creatures which are unsatisfied with their current state, but we should be free like any other animal, to live without clothing.

Bring the uncensored version back, it's just art!

The fine art in this app is Not porn and anyone (Steve) who would worry about what others would think of them for presenting uncensored fine art are cowards. You must be brave. The brave are simply those with the clearest vision of what is before them, glory and danger alike and not withstanding, go out to meet it.

Whoever called the original version porn needs to take a few art or photography classes. I am a photographer and like to study the classics to improve my visualization skills.

Art & porn are two different things. This fine art should not be considered porn. As for parents worried about kids...take care of your own kids yourself...sorry but it isn't the medias job to worry about your wandering childrens eyes.

I do not consider the originals porn. However adults understand this.

The nude policy at Apple is unclear because of incongruency, and to customers and developers, its frustrating and confusing.

I don't think the original paintings are pornographic at all

its just art u can show them uncensored